Part of me hates to bandwagon onto this topic, as so much has already been said. It is a bit strange that as our economy sputters, the Middle East burns, and our communities descend into violence, we choose to obsess over the personal decisions of someone who a few years ago would have been considered a D-list celebrity. However I’m going to do it; not because I feel compelled to support or attack Jenner, but because the transgendered movement—and our society’s response to that movement—is illustrative of a broader, more important trend.
There is a shift going on in our culture to deny objective reality and to substitute in its place subjective feelings. While we should respect and value the human rights of each individual, we do not have the “right” to determine our own reality, nor do we have the right to then force everyone else to go along with it. This path leads not to liberation and fulfillment, but to chaos, confusion, and profound dissatisfaction.
Who are we?
There are two ways to approach this question: reason and religion. They both lead to the same conclusion, which is that there are certain aspects of our nature that we cannot change and therefore should accept. Though we have different faiths, we all share a capacity for reason; thus, I will confine most of my analysis to the former.
Reason and science tell us that we are born either male or female (though a small minority of children are born intersex, with biological features of both sexes). At birth, our chromosomes and reproductive organs distinguish us as male or female; otherwise, we are quite similar. Now most parents will tell you that differences in temperament and preferences will crop up even in small children, but this leads to the argument over how much of this is biological and how much is socially constructed, so I’ll leave it alone for now.
Reason and science also tell us that during puberty, our bodies undergo specific changes, depending on whether we are male or female. Girls develop breasts and begin menstruating. Boys develop facial hair and start producing semen. Both the sperm of a man and the egg of a woman are necessary in order for human reproduction to occur. Not the sperm of someone who “identifies” as male, or the egg of someone who “identifies” as female, but the sperm of someone who is male and the egg of someone who is female. Despite all the innovations in fertility science, no man can ever menstruate. No woman can ever produce semen. These are the facts of our biology, undeniable and unalterable.
So why as a society are we acting otherwise?
Are we doing it in a misguided attempt to show compassion to individuals who are obviously troubled and confused? Are we doing it to show how tolerant and open-minded we are? Are we doing it to achieve a sense of moral superiority over those who still cling to “backward” and “outdated” views of human sexuality?
Let’s put your tolerance to the test. For those of you who support and celebrate Jenner’s decision, do you deny objective reality in other areas of your lives? Would you fly on a plane piloted by someone who “identifies” as a pilot, but who has no flight experience? Would you put your life in the hands of someone who “identifies” as a surgeon, but has no medical training? If your child told you she “identified” as an old person, would you take her to a retirement home? If someone “identified” as a different race, would you encourage her to dye her skin? If someone “identified” as a disabled person, would you support his decision to amputate his healthy legs?
Or at some point do you have to say: you are who you are, regardless of what you feel you are. So make peace with your body. Accept yourself. Love yourself as you are. We do, and God does.
How is it compassionate to encourage someone to alter his body in a radical, irreversible way, especially when a large percentage of men who “transition” later regret it? How is it loving to encourage someone down this path, when suicide mortality actually rises post-operation to 20-fold the non-transgender rate?
Of course, the great irony of the transgender movement is its obvious conflict with feminism. Many feminists claim gender is a social construct, and women should be appreciated for more than just their beauty and bodies. The transgender movement claims gender is a biological reality, and that a man can become a woman simply by castrating himself and putting on a dress. How offensive to women. And yet even enlightened liberals like Jon Stewart can’t see the connection between this distorted view of gender and the objectification of women?
I remember wanting to be a boy when I was little. They seemed to have all the fun, and they could pee standing up. At the age of three, I showed up at a friend’s Thanksgiving party with war paint on my face and feathers in my hair, while all the other girls were wearing pilgrim dresses. My tomboy streak continues to this day. But at a certain point—and I don’t even remember when that point was—I made peace with my female body. I realized that I could paint my nails and like boys, and still play football and climb trees. Being a woman doesn’t mean wearing makeup or putting on a sexy swimsuit for the entertainment of men. It means being created with the capacity to nurture a human life. That’s what the breasts and ovaries and uterus are for, not attracting “oohs” and “ahhs,” or selling magazines.
Women can do things our society associates with men and still be women. Men can do things our society typically associates with women and still be men. How can we deny this, and still claim to support equality?
I’ll conclude this post with two stories. The first involves a friend of my dad’s, a self-described Massachusetts liberal. This friend holds all the politically correct positions one would expect from someone of his background in that part of the country. He was recently attending the graduation of one of his children from a well-known liberal arts college when he noticed the restrooms were labeled “Those Who Self-Identify as Men” and “Those Who Self-Identify as Women.” Astonished at the ridiculousness of the situation, he made the mistake of telling his children. They, of course, promptly chastised him for his backwardness. The whole experience left him puzzled and wondering why he had just paid several thousands of dollars for their so-called educations.
The next story involves my own son, though I hesitate to bring him into this for fear of making him part of the controversy. I must have been scrolling around on Facebook when a picture of Bruce Jenner popped up. My son exclaimed: “Oh, I know about him.” My first reaction was to panic and wonder just what my seven-year-old had been exposed to. But intuitively, I trusted him.
“Oh, yeah? What do you know?” I asked.
He replied, “I know he was an athlete and then he got married and had children, but then he had a big problem.”
“What problem?” I asked.
“He felt like he was a woman, but his body was a man’s.”
“Oh,” I said. “That is a problem. What do you think he should do about it?”
Then my son looked at me as though I had just asked the most obvious question in the world. “Pray to God,” he said. I could almost hear the unspoken “Duh!”
When I remarked upon his wisdom, my son added, “There’s no pills or surgery that can fix that. You need God.”
We often forget the innocent wisdom of children, though it is our job to protect and nurture that very innocence. It makes you wonder how the most educated members of our society can be so confused about such simple truths. The emperor truly is wearing no clothes, and—just like in the fairy tale story—it takes a child to point this out.
The ones claiming Jenner is a woman simply because he feels like a woman (whatever that means) are the same people who claim conservatives are in denial about science, and we should all line up behind their expertise on a range of political and social issues.
Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner is not a woman, because being a woman is not a lifestyle choice. It is not something you can buy. It is not about having a pointy chin or big boobs or long hair. You can be a woman and have none of these things. Like being a man, being a woman is a biological reality. We are created as a unified mind, body, and soul; the three are not divisible. This doesn’t mean we can’t show compassion to people who struggle with gender identity. The most loving and compassionate thing we can do is to encourage them to accept their bodies as God (or nature, if you prefer) created them.
14 thoughts on “Why Bruce Jenner Is Not a Woman”
You’re apparently deluded by truth and my vanity won’t all me to tolerate or like your post. How dare you speak from a reasonably sound mind. You’re lucky you have me to point out your wisdom and I’m appalled. I’ll pray for your vexed soul of righteous faith.
Reblogged this on Alternative Mother.
Very well said. Unfortunately the masses don’t want to hear it and will lash out at the truth. Science itself proves that homosexuality is wrong. Firstly, a woman and a woman or a man and a man cannot create a baby. Secondly, if you say you are a woman but do not have the right parts, you are not a woman. Basic science. As a traditionally conservative Catholic, I pray for those who believe that homosexuality is right and those that believe that transgender surgery is right. I pity them for someday they will have to face the truth. I do not hate them. I do however, hate the ideals that they are trying to force on others. It’s like trying to tell me that water is not wet. The truth must be stood up for and I will continue to do so.
Reblogged this on CALEB COY and commented:
Confrontational thoughts from a fellow blogger. Despite how tired we might be of the Bruce Jenner story, what angles are being neglected?
The fact that you, a healthy woman, can dismiss gender dysphoria by essentially equating it with being a tomboy demonstrates very well that you do not have the foggiest idea what you are talking about.
I am not dismissing it, and I never said gender dysphoria is the same as being a tomboy. I brought up being a tomboy to illustrate that we must all learn to accept our bodies, even if we don’t fit into tidy categories of masculinity or femininity. It is okay for men to exhibit qualities typically associated with women, and vice versa. For example, men can be sensitive and thoughtful, while women can be athletic and courageous. From what I can tell, gender dysphoria is a real condition, but it is a mental disorder like schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. We would not tell someone with schizophrenia that people really are out to get them, and we shouldn’t tell people with gender dysphoria that they can really change their gender. Instead, we should do everything we can to make sure they get the love and treatment they need.
Everything except, as I read your article, surgically making them as similar to the gender they are mentally, right? Or do I misread your article?
Correct, as gender reassignment surgery is a form of self-mutilation that can only lead to regret and/or lack of fulfillment. This article by an African-American woman says it very well: http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2015/06/15108/ “What if we spent the money we spend on surgery and drugs on therapy and learning self-love? We should be teaching a message of self-acceptance instead of buying into the latest surgeries or believing we’re born in the wrong body.”
I’m guessing you also think homosexuals can be “cured,” hmm? Is there ANY medical support for your conclusion that gender dysphoria can be cured by “love” and “self-acceptance”?
There are few scientific studies, as even asking the question has become taboo. When a 2003 study by Dr. Robert Spitzer found some evidence that sexual orientation could be changed with therapy, it was so ruthlessly attacked that he was forced to recant his “heretical” conclusions. However, there are several individual testimonies, like that of Walt Heyer.
The article you cite, by the way, is pure nonsense. It attempts to equate race with gender, and the disadvantages that come with being of a particular race as equivalent to the deep physical and psychological problems of being born in the wrong body.
The article does not equate race and gender; it simply uses the comparison to show how certain facts of our identity should be accepted in order to have good mental health. While there is a clear scientific basis for sexual difference, the differences between “races” are far more fluid and culturally determined. I dispute the very idea that a person can be “born into the wrong body,” but this is clearly an issue where we will continue to disagree.
I applaud you for this! Also, you’re obviously doing a great job teaching your little boy!